有关流感疫苗有效性的文献研究举例
回答: 流感疫苗就是骗二傻子的?二傻子还当宝贝呢! 由 alad6park 于 2022-01-31 7:06
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X20311464?via%3Dihub
Across all influenza seasons, HD-IIV3 demonstrated improved protection against ILI compared to SD-IIV (rVE = 15.9%, 95% CI: 4.1–26.3%). HD-IIV3 was also more effective at preventing hospital admissions from all-causes (rVE = 8.4%, 95% CI: 5.7–11.0%), as well as influenza (rVE = 11.7%, 95% CI: 7.0–16.1%), pneumonia (rVE = 27.3%, 95% CI: 15.3–37.6%), combined pneumonia/influenza (rVE = 13.4%, 95% CI: 7.3–19.2%) and cardiorespiratory events (rVE = 17.9%, 95% CI: 15.0–20.8%). Reductions in mortality due to pneumonia/influenza (rVE = 39.9%, 95% CI: 18.6–55.6%) and cardiorespiratory causes (rVE = 27.7%, 95% CI: 13.2–32.0%) were also observed. Similar pooled rVEs were observed in both matched and mismatched seasons and in seasons where A/H3N2 or A/H1N1 strains were predominantly circulating.选取这篇举例的原因是,这是一篇文献汇总,其引用了大量其他研究的结果,更全面。希望你也能举出支持你论点的文献研究:
比如“第一,很多人打了流感疫苗就流感了,不打倒正常。这说明什么?”
这个事例的比例多少?研究涉及的样本空间,研究样本人群构成,对照组情况。
比如“第二,你去查一下疫苗保鲜剂是些什么东西再来说疫苗的毒副作用不迟!”
有关这个毒副作用研究的样本空间,研究样本人群构成,症状发病率和自然发病率的对比。
内容来自网友分享,若违规或者侵犯您的权益,请联系我们
所有跟帖: ( 主贴楼主有权删除不文明回复,拉黑不受欢迎的用户 )
楼主前期社区热帖:
>>>>查看更多楼主社区动态...