[返回哲学世界首页]·[所有跟帖]·[ 回复本帖 ] ·[热门原创] ·[繁體閱讀]·[坛主管理]

who said "all doesn't exist" in ancient India

送交者: 湖叶[♂☆★声望品衔7★☆♂] 于 2022-03-30 19:13 已读 240 次  

湖叶的个人频道

+关注

回答: "emptiness" is an overvalued notion. 由 湖叶 于 2022-03-30 19:03

From my personal view, we can deny the existence of anything but not ourselves. Otherwise, who is there suffering. It is hard to know who said "all doesn't exist" in ancient India, if you think it is too naive to take legend or myth as history. Someone told me Gautama Buddha feel regret before his death (finally he put down his self rightness and lie down to accept Nirvana) about that he told people that life is meaningless but full of sufferings, (If everybody follow him to escape from life, there would not be any human beings left. )so there would be Mahayana which is much better than original Buddhism.

I think that it is possible, since it is obvious to me that if you don't know it is because the only existence is the real you or the true you so that all the other things doesn't really exist, you have not yet actually enlighten or awaken by yourself. but still been blinded by an emptiness or nothingness.

By the way, I also think someone falsified Platform Sutra by adding "all doesn't exist" into it. And I suspect it was manipulated by some emperor because they don't like to see others have their own self esteem and hard to become their minions or slavers spiritually.
喜欢湖叶朋友的这个贴子的话, 请点这里投票,“赞”助支持!

内容来自网友分享,若违规或者侵犯您的权益,请联系我们

所有跟帖:   ( 主贴楼主有权删除不文明回复,拉黑不受欢迎的用户 )


用户名: 密码: [--注册ID--]

标 题:

粗体 斜体 下划线 居中 插入图片插入图片 插入Flash插入Flash动画


     图片上传  Youtube代码器  预览辅助



[ 留园条例 ] [ 广告服务 ] [ 联系我们 ] [ 个人帐户 ] [ 创建您的定制新论坛频道 ] [ Contact us ]