中央政府把人招来开会，代表还要用笔记录，那是石器时代的政治运作方式  The central government invited people to the meeting, and the deputies also used pens to record. That was the way the Stone Age politics operated.
 

Mar 5, 2017 at 3:07 PM

 

http://blog.******/u/2209/201703/284687.html

政治管理应该现代化  Political management should be modernized
上面的网页，讲的是家长带孩子去中国旅游，吃遍各地小吃，结果孩子印象最深的居然是肉夹馍. 我看了以后，哈哈大笑！真的，我也想不明白，为什么Jackie去了敦煌一次，回来不提沙漠，不提石窟，不提那个表演，不提深夜寂静无人满天星光和一路上树上星星点点的垂灯，却只记得看演出前去当地美食街，第一次吃到的肉夹馍. 她也跟那两个孩子一样，因为好吃又要了一个. 那么追捧肉夹馍，可能是像汉堡包吧. 她洋盘，不识货，我有啥办法呢？ 我今天看你们又在开会，Jackie 昨天说你们在阿拉斯加，怎么回事儿？你们开会时候，还跟普京，乌克兰Poroshenko，拉脱维亚的领袖讲话？那一定不是你们，所以藉故千推万拒不想跟Jackie见面，是吧？看见你们几千号人坐在一起开会，在这边的那只有是宗教集会才会有的规模. 看那些代表，小组开会的时候用笔记录讲话，我就觉得挺奇怪. 你们现在都有语音记录软件，不但可以把语音用中文记录下来, 还可以同步翻译成英文. 你们那么多人开会，每个人拿笔来记，又慢又分心，是不是应该随时随地设置一个记录软件，配备电脑和打印机. 等到会议结束，让人稍微整理，就可以电邮寄出给每人或者相关单位，或者把文件打印出来让代表自己去取. 也不必一定要大家都聚在一起开会，象你们世界政坛，无论是谁，就是远在天涯海角都可以视频连线，都可以天天情话绵绵. 有啥事儿直接沟通随时告知，不就成了. 你们把人招来，还要用笔记录，那是石器时代的政治运作方法. 是有别的目的吗？还是有人像我这样子一定要求要亲自见面，才能跟Jackie建立感情呢？我从小看见开会就头疼的. 因为你们要把大家召集起来坐在一起讲几句话，那所能转达的信息的效果是很有限的. 但却要花很多功夫在会议的准备上面，印发告示，通知大家，准备场地，音响系统，座椅，还要打破别人的时间安排一定要来参加这些会议. 他们不但得看着领导们一个一个地露面，然后领导又会被观众私下一个一个议论一番. 我跑到美国来，这边大学里面没有会议，除非毕业典礼. 工作的公司里也没会议，除非讨论项目进展. 更没有政治会议.  但是，军工单位里的项目进展讨论，我从来坐最后排，有时候是不同的公司，有时候一开几小时，或几天，而讨论的东西我知道是根本做不出来的. 我于是就很纳闷，他们是真的不知道呢，还是找个机会过场，让大家在一起聚聚可以以公司名义聚餐，你看看我，我看看你？

 

The above webpage is about parents taking their children to China for a trip, eating snacks from all over the places, but the child's most impressed is actually the meat clipper. After I watched it, I laughed! Really, I also don't understand why Jackie went to Dunhuang once, and came back without mentioning the desert, the grotto, the performance, the late night silence, the starry lights on the trees along the way, but she just remember to go to the local food street before watching the show. The first time she ate the meat clipper. Her reaction was the same as those two children, because it tasted good so she wanted another one. Then the meat clipper may be like hamburgers. She was ignorant without know any good food. What can I do? I see you guys meeting again today, Jackie said yesterday that you are in Alaska, what's going on? During your meeting, you also spoke to Putin, Ukrainian Poroshenko, Latvian leader? That must not be you, so that is why you have to push back and forth and refuse to meet Jackie in person, right? Seeing thousands of you sitting together for meetings, here is a scale that can only be held in a religious assembly. Looking at those representatives, each used a pen to record speeches during the group meeting, and I feel very strange. You all have voice  recording software now, not only can record the voice in Chinese, but also translate it into English at the same time. So many of you are in a meeting, everyone takes a pen to write down, it is slow and distracting. Should you set up a recording software, equipped with a computer and printer anytime, anywhere?  When the meeting is over and people can sort it out a little bit, then email it to everyone or the relevant unit, or print out the document for the representative to pick it up. You don’t even have to have everyone gather for a meeting, like your World Political Forum. No matter who it is, you can connect to the video remotely, even at the far end of the earth. You can talk about love every day. If there is any thing, just go direct communication,  let people know at any time, it’s just that. You have to ask  people come, and each has to write for a record, that ’s the Stone Age political operation method. Is there any other purpose? Or does someone like me has to meet in person to build a real relationship with Jackie? I have had a headache for meetings since I was a child. Because you have to gather everyone to sit and talk together for a few words, the effect of the information that can be conveyed is very limited. But it takes a lot of effort to prepare for the meeting and issue notices to inform everyone, prepare the venue, audio system, seats, and break the schedule of others  to be sure to come to these meetings. Not only do they have to watch the leaders appear one by one, and then the leaders will be discussed privately one by one by the audiences. I came to the United States, there is no meeting in the university here, except for the graduation ceremony. There is no meeting in the company I work, unless there is a discussion of project progress. There is no political meeting. However, for project progress discussions in defense units, I always sit in the last row, sometimes different companies meet together, sometimes open for hours or days, and discuss something I know that they can’t make it work at all. I ’m wondering if they really don’t know, or just find a chance to cut the scene, let everyone get together to have a meal in the name of the company, look at me, look at you?