[返回笔迹解惑首页]·[所有跟帖]·[ 回复本帖 ] ·[热门原创] ·[繁體閱讀]·[坛主管理]

Current World Graphology Overview

送交者: 韩进[☆★★声望品衔11★★☆] 于 2021-08-01 16:29 已读 15935 次  

韩进的个人频道

+关注
Current World Graphology Overview

Chinese handwriting master Jin Han


 


Since China is isolated from the world, China does not know the world and the world does not know China, especially in the field of handwriting.


 


According to written records, the Chinese people were the first to realized that handwriting resembles the writer , but it was only until 300 years ago when Europeans published books in this area, handwriting analysis formed a subject. Since then, many countries around the world have made remarkable achievements, while China has stagnated for a long time. Until the end of the 1980s, Qingyuan Xu and me made breakthroughs and invented two kinds of dynamic analysizing method, Touch and Feel method and Intuitive Imitation method respectively. Chinese handwriting has sprung up, making rapid progress in the technical field and quickly surpassing the level of other countries in the world. In over a decade, achieved the goal of a comprehensive analysis of the inner world. After 2010, I achieved the goal of systematically analyzing the inner world with the help of Enneagram Theory and in 2020 completed a systematic study of graphology theory. At this point, handwriting has finally become a complete new science, with complete and credible scientific theories as well as evaluation techniques that can stand the test of practice.


 


From a philosophical point of view, there is a question of whether there is a chicken or an egg first. The perfection and finalization of handwriting science also has a question of which theory and technology come first.


 


My experience was that starting from highly accurate conclusions, then traced the reasons to the realization that "the essence of handwriting is the habit of action", and then the understanding can rise to rational knowledge. This was the basic principle I used to invent Intuitive Imitation method.


 


Its not enough to analyze handwriting comprehensively and systematically. Its not enough to just establish a complete theory for the Intuitive Imitation method. It is also necessary to understand the principle backing validity of other analyzing methods, such as the Touch and Feel method and had a clear understanding of the weakness in the overwhelming tactic Characteristic method. The complete maturity of the handwriting theory is the final result of this breakthrough. Thorough knowledge, standing at this height is an academic summit.


 


After reaching the summit, I read the graphology materials of various countries and looked at the analysis and conclusions of experts from various countries. My feeling is that they are like primary school students.


 


 


Theory comes from practice. Without superb analytical techniques, it is impossible to generate a spark of rational cognition; without clear and accurate theoretical guidance, the techniques for analyzing handwriting certainly cannot be fully integrated. Theory and technology are complementary to each other, and no one can do without.


 


There is no limit to the depth of handwriting analysis, and everyone has room for development.


 


 


However, currently the situation of handwriting in the world is already a different story.


 


At the time when Chinese handwriting was rising strongly, the world handwriting was in decline.


As early as 1994, when the Chinese Handwriting Research Association (preparatory) held its first meeting in Beijing, Chinese handwriting experts believed that the characteristic method of Western handwriting was "anatomy of a corpse." With extremely limited information, Chinese handwriting experts still believe that their level is far beyond that of other countries in the world. There is only one reason: they have never seen a relatively high level of foreign analysis conclusions. Around 2002, after I analyzed the handwriting for Taiwanese friends many times, the feedback I got was that my conclusions reached far exceeded those of other countries in the world in terms of depth and breadth.


Chinese handwriting experts jokingly claim that the handwriting analysis of countries around the world is at the elementary school level, and the underlying reason is precisely based on the weakness of unreliability and unpredictability of the characteristic method overwhelmingly used in Western analysis. It seems disrespectful and disrespectful of colleagues, but in essence it is a serious criticism of their lack of scientific credibility.


 


Handwriting is the writing of one’s heart and brain, which is the scientific basis of handwriting. However, this foundation alone does not determine that handwriting is a science. Only when it reaches the height of "handwriting is a writing trace that can correctly reflect the habits of writing", can handwriting ensure its own scientificity. The handwriting is the writing of heart, but not the image. Observing the handwriting in the same way as observing a static object is in itself an unreliable way of buying a cat through a cloth bag. The handwriting image is regarded as a mysterious symbol, and the symbolism association is made through imagination. It's just ridiculous.


 


Treating handwriting as static images or graphics can indeed draw some valid conclusions but that’s only because the close connection between human inner world and handwriting and even a bad shot can still get something. It must be understood that dynamic analysis methods are much more effective and reliable. Blindly obsessed with static characteristics, it is easy to go down the wrong path. The essence of handwriting is the habit of action, an organic matter of the trinity of shape, speed, and pen pressure. The characteristic method of pure static analysis dismembered the unity and organicity of handwriting. Some characteristic method experts mysteriously assumed the posture that they got the a secret, arbitrarily asserting that this characteristic is this personality and that characteristic is that. This is like interfering a living person from a dead one. This may work for other natural science field but definitely not for Psychology  and not for Handwriting Analysis. But much damage has been done by such experts and resulted in the distrust of handwriting analysis we meet today.


 


Handwriting experts from various countries claim that they have done serious and detailed research, saying that they accurately calculate the tilt, angle and spacing, and accurately observe the pen pressure under magnification... In fact, the insiders know that the accuracy here is nonsense. The handwriting itself is unstable. Everyone writes his own name and address, and he can't find two identical copies even after he writes it 100 times. The so-called precision, how can it be so mysterious? Obviously unreliable! Even if someone really managed to be so precise with measurement, it will only be an attempt to frighten laymen with this. Just as a fortune teller uses precise time division to conceal the parascience nature of predicting future destiny by birth date.


 


The 1980s to the 1990s were the most prosperous period of handwriting in the world. But the tree attracts the wind, which has attracted the opposition's test. The result was a fiasco in handwriting, with almost no convincing test results. It should be said that this has fully exposed the current situation of Western graphology that lacks both scientific theory and excellent technology. This result is expected by the opposition and is inevitable.


 


The consequence of the fiasco of world handwriting is that the validity and reliability of handwriting are generally suspected, and the scope of its use is greatly reduced. The pseudo-scientific hat has sapped the prestige of handwriting, and even some notoriety, so that in the current information field represented by Wikipedia, the dissemination of scientific information on handwriting has been suppressed and it is very difficult. In the Western public opinion, the general attitude is to admit that handwriting is writing of the heart, and handwriting is actually action directly straight by the brain, that is, it has a scientific foundation, but Handwriting Analysis as a subject is not reliable. Some psychologists are merciful and concerned that they may throw the baby out when bath water is poured, and they are unwilling to equate handwriting with phrenology and Feng Shui.


 


It was at a time when the world's handwriting had failed miserably, that Chinese handwriting had risen against the trend. However, due to China’s isolation and lack of information, the Chinese handwriting scholars knew almost nothing about the world situation. When I went out of the country to promote the method of Intuitive Imitation, I did not expect that I was facing a battlefield with a mess of corpses. The night was deep and the wind was biting...


 


The world needs fresh blood of Chinese handwriting, otherwise it cannot be regenerated, because it is basically dead. Chinese handwriting scholars need to learn a lesson, especially those experts from the Characteristic method school in China, must adhere to a completely and thorough scientific spirit and attitude, and not leave a trace of flaws.


 这是《当前世界笔迹学概况》的英文版。
01/08、2021


 

喜欢韩进朋友的这个贴子的话, 请点这里投票,“赞”助支持!

已标注为韩进的原创内容,若需转载授权请联系网友本人。若违规侵权,请联系我们

所有跟帖:   ( 主贴楼主有权删除不文明回复,拉黑不受欢迎的用户 )


用户名: 密码: [--注册ID--]

标 题:

粗体 斜体 下划线 居中 插入图片插入图片 插入Flash插入Flash动画


     图片上传  Youtube代码器  预览辅助



[ 留园条例 ] [ 广告服务 ] [ 联系我们 ] [ 个人帐户 ] [ 创建您的定制新论坛频道 ] [ Contact us ]